Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watcgl!idallen
From: idallen@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Ian! D. Allen [CGL])
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Poor NFS Performance (was Re: Managing a network of UNIX workstations)
Message-ID: <13022@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 19 Jan 90 04:26:27 GMT
References: <3949@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <9338@cbmvax.commodore.com> <12938@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <1425@atha.AthabascaU.CA>
Reply-To: idallen@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Ian! D. Allen [CGL])
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 13

In article <1425@atha.AthabascaU.CA> lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes:
>Have you adjusted the retry, timeout, and write-size values for your
>NFS mounts? Given enough wobbling of these parameters I have been able
>to sucessfully use a 3b2 (!!) as an NFS server.

With what performance penalty, compared to running a "make" with the
files available locally?  Running a "make" on our VS3200/3.0 served by
our unloaded VAX8600/BSD4.3 took at least twice as long as running it
with all the files on the VS3200 itself.  Are you saying you can "tweak"
this down to something more reasonable?  Examples?
-- 
-IAN! (Ian! D. Allen) idallen@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca idallen@watcgl.waterloo.edu
 [129.97.128.64]  Computer Graphics Lab/University of Waterloo/Ontario/Canada