Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!shelby!neon!neon.Stanford.EDU!ham From: ham@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Peter R. Ham) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: Re: streams, pmax Message-ID: Date: 13 Jan 90 22:09:22 GMT References: <9001130258.AA00746@foobar.Colorado.EDU> Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System) Distribution: gnu Organization: Stanford University Lines: 11 In-Reply-To: grunwald@FOOBAR.COLORADO.EDU's message of 13 Jan 90 02:58:52 GMT I've seen this problem too. I think that the problem is that the rest of the lines are pending output and foo->flush should clear them. I don't think it should be necessary. Either the \n should cause flushing or the destructor should. One of the maintainers of libg++, I forget the name, said that he knew about the problem and was still working on it. -- Peter Ham PO Box 3430 (h)(415) 322-4390 MS Computer Science Student Stanford, CA ham@cs.stanford.edu Stanford University 94309 (o)(415) 723-2067