Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Message-ID: <1990Jan14.211304.21370@twwells.com> Date: 14 Jan 90 21:13:04 GMT References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan14.142457.19621@twwells.com> Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Lines: 26 In article emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes: : In article <1990Jan14.142457.19621@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes: : I moderate comp.archives. I also moderate an Objectivism mailing : list. I defy you to find a flame on either. : : or much of anything on comp.archives in its original few months of : operation, for what that's worth. That's true, but a little misleading. For whatever reason, people do not post that much on comp.archives. (Yes, I have to take part of the blame: I really should have promoted comp.archives better. But that is water under the bridge.) Now, Ed is scarfing up appropriate postings from other groups and reposting them on comp.archives; I wish I had the time to do things like that, but I'm always very busy. : The question is, whether they would be more objectionable : quibbling over their own usenet turf, or invading other sections. They're already invading other sections. With a newsgroup of their own, those that dislike Objectivists can look forward to not having to put up with them. --- Bill { uunet | novavax | ankh } !twwells!bill bill@twwells.com