Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv
From: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <EMV.90Jan14174127@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Date: 14 Jan 90 22:41:27 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com>
	<9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan14.142457.19621@twwells.com>
	<EMV.90Jan14141908@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu>
	<1990Jan14.211304.21370@twwells.com>
Sender: news@math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept., Ann Arbor MI.
Lines: 17
In-reply-to: bill@twwells.com's message of 14 Jan 90 21:13:04 GMT


me :            The question is, whether they would be more objectionable
   : quibbling over their own usenet turf, or invading other sections.

bill@twwells.com
   They're already invading other sections. With a newsgroup of
   their own, those that dislike Objectivists can look forward to
   not having to put up with them.

so I am to be encouraged to give them a base from which to launch
their nefarious, interminable, mind-poisoningly objectionable
campaigns?  Hardly.

I think that *.objectivism should be unmoderated, to make it more
easy to cross-post to talk.bizarre.  

--Ed