Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!phakt.usc.edu!tli
From: tli@phakt.usc.edu (Tony Li)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Vote for comp.dcom.brouters
Message-ID: <7400@chaph.usc.edu>
Date: 15 Jan 90 08:04:20 GMT
References: <1263.25b1dee3@csc.anu.oz>
Sender: news@chaph.usc.edu
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1263.25b1dee3@csc.anu.oz> pte900@csc.anu.oz writes:
    I don't really care whether the group is comp.sys.cisco or comp.dcom.brouters;
    but there should be a group for a discussion of such products.
    
    I prefer comp.dcom.brouters for generality,

Unfortunately it's not general enough.  As you probably know, there's
already a lot of different hardware in use: terminal servers, IP
routers, DECnet routers, CSU/DSUs, etc.  Perhaps a better solution is
comp.dcom.mans? 

Tony Li - USC Computer Science Department
Internet: tli@usc.edu Uucp: usc!tli
Thus spake the master programmer: "A well written program is its own
heaven; a poorly-written program its own hell."