Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!fornax!miron
From: miron@fornax.UUCP (Miron Cuperman )
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Summary: moderation ideas
Message-ID: <225@fornax.UUCP>
Date: 14 Jan 90 23:09:38 GMT
References: <1990Jan14.191035.20625@twwells.com>
Reply-To: miron@cs.sfu.ca (Miron S. Cuperman)
Organization: School of Computing Sceience, SFU, B.C., Canada
Lines: 12

I would support a moderated objectivism newsgroup.  I propose
a better moderation scheme.  Let there be more than one moderator.
If somebody gets turned down for a posting by one, he may appeal
to another.  If any of the moderators decides the article is OK
it will be posted.

Another scheme is to have alt.objectivism.  Anyone denied a post
to the moderated group may post to the unmoderated one.  If people
see that good articles get posted to the alt group and denied to
the sci group, the moderator may be replaced (by vote).

	Miron Cuperman <miron@cs.sfu.ca>