Xref: utzoo news.groups:16409 rec.arts.movies:28479 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pacbell!well!fico2!everexn!karen From: karen@everexn.uucp (Karen Valentino) Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.arts.movies Subject: Re: REC.ARTS.CINEMA -- drawing the discussion to a close? Message-ID: <1990Jan13.173807.9313@everexn.uucp> Date: 13 Jan 90 17:38:07 GMT References: <50608@bbn.COM> <1990Jan9.175821.19661@athena.mit.edu> <1990Jan11.033402.23405@sq.sq.com> Organization: Everex Systems, Inc. Lines: 30 msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) writes: >...I'd go for ANY semi-reasonable rec.arts.movies.something name >in preference to the (my opinion) stupid misnaming as rec.arts.cinema. I disagree with you. I think that re.arts.movies.* is more of a misnaming. To me, "rec.arts.cinema" embodies the group well, because the group is for the serious discussion of the art form of cinema. I subscribe to r.a.m., and skim over it (insert plug for nn's screen- oriented selection format here). I don't know if r.a.m. has always been the sort of group that it is now, but "arts" it ain't. It's a fun group for talking about movies, with the occasional serious thread that eventually becomes a fun thread. I'll probably be more qualified to post an article to r.a.m., but I'll enjoying *reading* r.a.c. much more. And the moderation, to which I'm still hearing some ojections, will save me lots of skimming and help to preserve the intended quality of the newsgroup. To anyone who objects to moderation of a nontechnical group--why? What about r.h.f., one of the most-read groups on usenet? A very successful group; technical?... What does consensus say is "technical?" And, even with a consensual definition of the word under our belts, why limit moderation to technical groups? Is there a guideline somewhere that I don't know about? And if there is one, why? Karen -- Karen Valentino <> Everex North (Everex Systems) <> Sebastopol, CA karen@everexn.uu.net ..{apple, well}!fico2!everexn!karen "I'm the Descartes of anxiety. I panic, therefore I am." -- Richard Lewis