Xref: utzoo news.groups:16419 alt.flame:14152
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bu.edu!bu-cs!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.flame
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <5285@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 15 Jan 90 18:39:21 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan14.142457.19621@twwells.com> <EMV.90Jan14141908@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu> <1990Jan14.211304.21370@twwells.com>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 18

In article <1990Jan14.211304.21370@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
>In article <EMV.90Jan14141908@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu> emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
>:            The question is, whether they would be more objectionable
>: quibbling over their own usenet turf, or invading other sections.
>
>They're already invading other sections. With a newsgroup of
>their own, those that dislike Objectivists can look forward to
>not having to put up with them.

Oh, is _that_ the reason?

Well, then, save us the newgroup and just instruct Objectivists
to post to alt.flame, instead, to be with the rest of the postings
that nobody really wants to see.

				--Blair
				  "We'll know what to do
				   with them..."