Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!APEE.OGI.EDU!mehuld From: mehuld@APEE.OGI.EDU (Mehul Dave) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Summary: sci.philosophy.objectivism is better Message-ID: <9001152101.AA29657@apee.ogi.edu> Date: 15 Jan 90 21:01:15 GMT References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <8P1157Gxds8@ficc.uu.net> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute (formerly OGC), Beaverton, OR Lines: 20 In article harris@portia.Stanford.EDU (Joe Harris) writes > I would much prefer that an Objectivism newsgroup be in the sci >hierarchy, rather than the talk hierarchy; e.g. sci.philosophy.objectivism. That's a good suggestion. I agree with this. > In my judgement, there is no real reason to have a moderator; anyone >who behaves irrationally can simply be ignored--and each individual can be >his own judge as to what constitutes irrationality. > I do not need anyone to tell me what does or does not belong in >an Objectivist newsgroup--that is a decision that I can make for myself. Agreed completely. -- --Mehul Dave-- (INTERNET :- mehuld@apee.ogi.edu) "To the banner of life, all could be given, even life itself" -- Ayn Rand