Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!sco!davidbe
From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion:  soc.history
Message-ID: <1382@scorn.sco.COM>
Date: 15 Jan 90 20:31:38 GMT
References: <2840561048@lewis.crd.ge.com> <2841149644@lewis.crd.ge.com> <1990Jan13.043754.15395@agate.berkeley.edu>
Sender: news@sco.COM
Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Organization: The Silly Code Originators
Lines: 20


She said that he said that she said that gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) said:
-
-  I have long thought that a history group would be a good idea,
-but was too lazy to count votes for one. As to the name, it seems
-to me that misc.history makes more sense, but I don't feel like
-starting a war over it. But why soc?

I agree.  A history group could go in any number of groups; I wouldn't
complain if it were in sci.  Misc seems like the best place for it, 
offhand.


-- 
      David Bedno, Systems Administrator, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
    Email: davidbe@sco.COM / ..!{uunet,sun,ucbvax!ucscc,gorn}!sco!davidbe 
   Phone: 408-425-7222 x5123 Disclaimer: Speaking from SCO but not for SCO.  

Is talk.lists a good idea?			     Is talk.lists a bad idea?
   mail yesvote@sco.COM		Vote ends 2/5		mail novote@sco.COM