Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bionet!ames!pacbell!varian!zehntel!deb
From: deb@zehntel.zehntel.com (Deborah Heller)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.sys.cisco
Keywords: dcom, brouters, repeaters, net analysis
Message-ID: <3223@zehntel.UUCP>
Date: 16 Jan 90 00:47:39 GMT
Sender: usenet@zehntel.UUCP
Reply-To: deb@zehntel.UUCP (Deborah Heller)
Followup-To: Tom Dixon and Tony Li's replies
Organization: Zehntel, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA
Lines: 19

> I would think that BOTH groups are a good idea.  The specialized group
> for discussing the particular vendor's products, the general group for
> broader subjects.  Currently, this traffic is in comp.dcom.lans, which
> isn't entirely appropriate.  Anyone with a better suggestion?
> comp.dcom.hardware?

	I vote for comp.dcom.cisco with something more like 
  Tom's idea of "comp.dcom.brouters." comp.dcom.hardware is another
  good one: for discussion of networking hardware problems/solutions and
  pointers to, perhaps, vendor specific groups such as comp.dcom.cisco.
  Hmmm... which will it be, comp.dcom.cisco or comp.sys.cisco (I vote for
  dcom.  Seems more appropriate).

	deb 
	:-}
Deborah Heller				UUCP:  ...!{decwrl,sun}!teraida!deb
Teradyne Zehntel Systems Division	Phone: (415) 932-6900
2625 Shadelands Drive
Walnut Creek, CA  94598			 Horse Lovers Are Stable People...