Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!aplcen!haven!udel!princeton!phoenix!greg From: greg@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Gregory Nowak) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Message-ID: <12959@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 16 Jan 90 06:08:19 GMT References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <8P1157Gxds8@ficc.uu.net> <9001152101.AA29657@apee.ogi.edu> Reply-To: greg@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Gregory Nowak) Organization: Princeton University, NJ Lines: 24 In article <9001152101.AA29657@apee.ogi.edu> mehuld@APEE.OGI.EDU (Mehul Dave) writes: }In article harris@portia.Stanford.EDU (Joe Harris) writes }> I would much prefer that an Objectivism newsgroup be in the sci }>hierarchy, rather than the talk hierarchy; e.g. sci.philosophy.objectivism. }That's a good suggestion. I agree with this. Beautiful! Sci.philosophy.meta is currently unused. It's yours! Have fun! Those of us who found objectivist postings unacceptable in sci.philosophy.tech thought that sci.philosophy.meta would be an acceptable relocation site. No objectivist has come forward with an argument as to why 'meta was less acceptable than 'tech, so presumably at least those objectivists such as Mr. Dave who felt free to post objectivist postings to 'tech would have no objection to posting them to 'meta: It's sci, it's philosophy, and the "meta" does a much better job than "tech" of covering the epistemological issues that objectivists claimed legitimized their presence in 'tech in the first place. Have fun in sci.philosophy.meta! rutgers!phoenix.princeton.edu!greg Gregory A Nowak/Phoenix Gang/Princeton NJ He is hardly Commander in Chief if he can't go around bombing two bit dictators whenever he feels like it. --Mike Friedman