Xref: utzoo news.groups:16462 talk.religion.newage:5395 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!samsung!usc!apple!sun-barr!newstop!sun!athena1!williamt From: williamt@athena1.Sun.COM (William A. Turnbow) Newsgroups: news.groups,talk.religion.newage Subject: Re: Updated Call for Votes: talk.religion.pagan Message-ID: <130316@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 16 Jan 90 17:54:19 GMT Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM Reply-To: williamt@sun.UUCP (William A. Turnbow) Lines: 38 Sorry folks, but for some obscure reason, I am responding to this and feel a need to keep matters somewhat clear. In article <9698@hoptoad.uucp> tim@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Maroney) writes: > [The newsgroup] is explicitly not a place for > proselytizing or preaching. The newsgroup shall be > moderated, but the moderation is explicitly limited > to the weeding out of off-charter messages (it is by > no means to extend to the editing of messages, or > the removal of messages because of a disagreement > between the moderator and any other party). (The > moderation is only included because that seems to > be the _only_ way to ensure that off-charter attempts > to prosyletize are not posted). > >"Off-charter messages" is clearly stated to apply only to messages >which proselytize or preach; the sole purpose of moderation is said to >be the removal of such messages. ----------- I'm sorry Tim, but the charter clearly indicates that any messages you may post about auto-body work, COBOL or anything else off charter can be weeded out. If only prosyletizing messages were to be removed or moderated, wouldn't the charter have specifically said "...the moderation is explicitly limited to the weeding out of prosyletizing messages"? That isn't what it said. What's the big deal here, you would think this was a life and death matter. Like mellow out. -wat- --- An it harm none, do what you will. *** Remember to VOTE YES to talk.religion.pagan (moderated). *** *** Send your vote To: olorin@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu ***