Xref: utzoo sci.philosophy.tech:1934 alt.individualism:2188 news.groups:16464 talk.philosophy.misc:3447 talk.politics.misc:41266 talk.politics.theory:4589
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!ide!lola!lofdahl
From: lofdahl@lola.uucp (Corey Lofdahl)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,alt.individualism,news.groups,talk.philosophy.misc,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.theory
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Keywords: Objectivism, Rand, newsgroup, moderated/unmoderated
Message-ID: <278@ide.UUCP>
Date: 16 Jan 90 02:13:29 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001132357.AA18208@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan14.074050.18580@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: usenet@ide.COM
Reply-To: lofdahl@lola.UUCP (Corey Lofdahl)
Distribution: na
Organization: IDE, San Francisco
Lines: 18

>>I will vote against this newsgroup with the proposed moderator.  An
>>unmoderated newsgroup is acceptable.  I do not trust Mr. Wells's
>>judgement on what constitutes flames and what is related to objectivism
>>and what is not.

>>--Mehul Dave--                        

> [I agree] Dinah Schein              

I'm behind you Mr Wells.  I think the newsgroup should be moderated.
Really, here's a guy that's going out of his way to provide a forum
and these two people "don't trust him".  I really hate to see this.
If Mr. Dave and Ms. Schein don't like the moderation method, there
are plenty of unmoderated newsgroups they can slog through.  Just don't
turn into a little Caesar Mr. Wells and make me regret my support.

----------------------------------------------corey------------------------
                                              lofdahl@ide.com