Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!Teknowledge.COM!polya!shelby!neon!Gang-of-Four!weening From: weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Joe Weening) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION comp.sys.alliant Message-ID: Date: 17 Jan 90 04:20:20 GMT References: <6828@hacgate.scg.hac.com> Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System) Followup-To: news.groups Distribution: usa Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University Lines: 10 In-Reply-To: kelly@ipla01.hac.com's message of 15 Jan 90 17:20:42 GMT I'm in favor of comp.sys.alliant, but I think that it shouldn't be limited to the FX series (there will be other Alliant systems in the future, and I don't know if they'll be called FX), and it should be gatewayed with the info-alliant mailing list. Several years ago I tried to get comp.sys.alliant created as an inet group and gatewayed with info-alliant, but didn't succeed in getting this done. -- Joe Weening Computer Science Dept. weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU Stanford University