Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!oliveb!pyramid!ctnews!unix386!dougm
From: dougm@unix386.Convergent.COM (The Manic Tinker)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: REC.ARTS.CINEMA -- drawing the discussion to a close?
Summary: moderation et. al.
Message-ID: <775@unix386.Convergent.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 90 01:48:10 GMT
References: <11015@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Organization: Unisys/Convergent, San Jose, CA
Lines: 15

In article <11015@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>, rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
> Moderation should only be used as a last resort.  Why not set this
> group up as unmoderated, someone can volunteer to write and post the
> monthly article explaining what belongs in r.a.m and what belongs in
> the proposed group, try it for four or five months and see how it
> goes?

This compromise seems quite reasonable, although four or five months
seems a bit long to me (I think three would be plenty).  Discussion?


-- 
         Doug Moran          |  I have often felt like a resident of Pompeii
pyramid!ctnews!unix386!dougm |  who has been asked for some humorous comments
dougm@unix386.Convergent.com |  on lava.