Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!jeffd From: jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Sci vs. talk for Objectivism Message-ID: Date: 18 Jan 90 12:28:41 GMT Organization: Ferranti International Controls Corporation Lines: 18 After reading the discussions of what is and is not appropriate for sci, I have to concur that talk.philosophy.objectivism or talk.objectivism would be more appropriate. I still think it should be unmoderated, but, if it is to be moderated, Bill Wells strikes me as being a good choice. Co- moderation would also be acceptable. Jeff Daiell Aside to Tricky Dicky: regarding your response to my crack about your mental state ... nice try, but it didn't work. -- If a hungry man has water, and a thirsty man has bread, Then if they trade, be not dismayed, they both come out ahead. -- Don Paarlberg