Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!saturn!xanthian From: xanthian@saturn.ADS.COM (Metafont Consultant Account) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Message-ID: <10506@saturn.ADS.COM> Date: 19 Jan 90 00:23:23 GMT References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <1990Jan14.133458.6501@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <8044@unix.SRI.COM> <9702@hoptoad.uucp> Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mt. View, CA (415) 960-7300 Lines: 36 In article Thomas Gramstad writes: >>From: tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) >>Date: 16 Jan 90 15:28:55 GMT > >>Rand's work has never been philosophy, despite the claims of a few >>people who don't read philosophy. It has always been political in >>nature. > >The Ayn Rand Society, an organization for professional philosophers >who are objectivists, is member of the American Philosophical Association. > >I am sure that APA would be interested in the information you apparently >have, which they seem to have missed, as to why objectivism is not a >philosophy. > >On second thought, maybe not. This has no bearing on the question of whether Objectivism is a "legitimate" (whatever that might mean) philosophy. To make a telling analogy, chiropracters are now admitted to the American Medical Association. This doesn't make them any more doctors, nor any less dangerous quacks. It is merely a comment on the hunger of a spineless professional organization for additional dues and the political power associated with greater membership. Admitting Randites to the APA doesn't elevate the Randites, it just degrades the APA. -- Again, my opinions, not the account furnishers'. xanthian@well.sf.ca.us xanthian@ads.com (Kent Paul Dolan) Kent, the (bionic) man from xanth, now available as a build-a-xanthian kit at better toy stores near you. Warning - some parts proven fragile. -> METAFONT, TeX, graphics programming done on spec -- (415) 964-4486 <-