Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!hacgate!ashtate!dbase!dveditz
From: dveditz@dbase.A-T.COM (Dan Veditz)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion:  soc.history
Message-ID: <383@dbase.A-T.COM>
Date: 18 Jan 90 22:56:18 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.043754.15395@agate.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: dveditz@dbase.A-T.com (Dan Veditz)
Organization: Ashton Tate Development Center Glendale, Calif.
Lines: 10

gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>  I have long thought that a history group would be a good idea,
>but was too lazy to count votes for one. As to the name, it seems
>to me that misc.history makes more sense, but I don't feel like
>starting a war over it. But why soc?

Agreed, on all points.

-Dan                                              |  uunet!ashtate!dveditz
Vote NO on moderated 'talk' groups.               |  dveditz@ashtate.A-T.com