Xref: utzoo news.groups:16612 alt.flame:14329 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!omicron.cs.fsu.edu!fsucs.cs.fsu.edu!peterson Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.flame From: peterson@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson) Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Message-ID: <9001190858.AA26727@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu> Reply-To: peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson) Organization: Florida State University Computer Science Department References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <9001142226.AA23247@apee.ogi.edu> <5286@buengc.BU.EDU> <1745@novavax.UUCP> Date: 19 Jan 90 19:33:47 GMT Lines: 37 In article <1745@novavax.UUCP>, maddoxt@novavax.UUCP (Thomas Maddox) writes: | | Objectivism *obviously* belongs in the sci hierarchy, and | equally obviously deserves special treatment: | | sci.gibbering.Objectivism.wells | | sci.gibbering.Objectivism.peoplewhohatewells. | andthinkheknowsdickaboutObjectivism | | and in a special move designed to take into account the exceptionally | profound and interesting nature of Objectivism: | | sci.gibbering.Objectivism.[insert name of any other loony who needs | his or her own Objectivist newsgroup for reasons of doctrinal purity or sheer | megalomania or just because] Instead of sci.gibbering.objectivism, how about alt.flame.objectivism? From the postings to this newsgroup, it seems like the Objectivists are better at disagreeing with each other about just what Objectivism is. Anyone care for misc.test.objectivism? | Finally, let us have alt.cisco, a simple enough solution, but | *only* if we also have alt.pancho. I was waiting for someone to notice that! | Tom "the Talleyrand of news.groups" Maddox. Eric -- Eric Peterson <> peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu <> uunet!nu.cs.fsu.edu!peterson Florida State Univ CS Dept Technician, Room 011 Love Bldg, Phone 904/644-2296 echo "This is not a pipe." | lpr -P laserjet2