Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sco!davidbe From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Sci vs. talk for Objectivism Message-ID: <1541@scorn.sco.COM> Date: 19 Jan 90 17:06:12 GMT References: Sender: news@sco.COM Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Organization: The Silly, Clueless and Organized Lines: 22 If all the yelling/screaming/flaming about what objectivism is hasn't convinced you that it should be a talk group, think about sci.politics. It'd be much the same. And why not sci.philosophy.rand, for the discussion of Ayn Rand's philosophical beliefs. That seems to be all you're arguing about anyway, and while objectivism may or may not be a valid philosophical system (I'd never heard of it, so I hold no opinions), the fact that it was Rand's is valid. being objective about objectivism. (Look ma! A discussion about s/t.philo.obj that doesn't flame anyone!) -- David Bedno, Systems Administrator, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Email: davidbe@sco.COM / ..!{uunet,sun,ucbvax!ucscc,gorn}!sco!davidbe Phone: 408-425-7222 x5123 Disclaimer: Speaking from SCO but not for SCO. my toes know the ramble, and i can dance my dance - chaos