Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SCFVM.BITNET!ZMLEB From: ZMLEB@SCFVM.BITNET (Lee Brotzman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: FIGI-L, and Forth versus(?) standards Message-ID: <9001200036.AA03287@jade.berkeley.edu> Date: 20 Jan 90 00:19:25 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 26 >First of all, a side comment. > > Would someone at SCFVM.bitnet or jade.berkeley.edu change the > FIGI-L mailing list gateway so that it leaves the Reply-to: field > set to the original poster, instead of bouncing replies back into > the mailing list? > FIGI-L Moderator speaking here... Yes, I could do this, but I hesitate to do so unless I get more than one request. I have about 80 subscribers on BITNET (God only knows how many readers on Usenet) and exactly one request to change the 'Reply-to:' field. Unless I hear a public outcry against the default for replies being sent to the list, I won't change. So, readers of FIGI-L (Usenet, etc.), if there is a problem with having your replies go to the list, please tell me. SEND E-MAIL TO ME, DON'T USE REPLY!!! :-) Personally, I prefer replying to the list and when I really want to send private mail, I still have that option. Others may feel differently, and are welcome to mail me directly. -- Lee Brotzman (FIGI-L Moderator) -- BITNET: ZMLEB@SCFVM Internet: zmleb@scfvm.gsfc.nasa.gov -- I'm only a contractor, don't blame me for the tax rates and don't blame -- the government for my statements.