Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!milton!tyche
From: tyche@milton.acs.washington.edu (Berg/Onstad)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Selling Forth to Manglement
Keywords: Source Control, Management
Message-ID: <1529@milton.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 90 22:10:41 GMT
Organization: Univ of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 17

Several people have discussed Marketing Forth and/or selling
Forth to Management. One thing I find missing in the discussion
is the mention of Source Code Control. I find this element
critical to projects that involve more than a couple people.
Are people using something like Polytron's PCS or MPW Projector
to store source diffs? How well does the blocks scheme work
with these source management systems? Forth words are decomposed
more than the average procedures in other languages. Does this
place special demands on a source management system?

Enquiring Minds want to know ...


Kevin Berg


than the average languages