Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!muslix!jac
From: jac@muslix.llnl.gov (James Crotinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Dog-ugly windows?
Message-ID: <45472@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
Date: 22 Jan 90 21:22:58 GMT
References: <1990Jan11.063225.28025@i-core.UUCP> <PORTUESI.90Jan12135835@tweezers.esd.sgi.com>
Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV
Reply-To: jac@muslix.UUCP (James Crotinger)
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory/UC Davis
Lines: 13


  Hate to get involved in this, but what the heck...

pete> Speaking of ugly interfaces, is there any uglier than the Amiga's?

Michael> Yes.  X is uglier by FAR.

  X specifies *NO* user interface whatsoever. It is up to the window
manager and the application toolkits to provide the look and feel.
I use X11R4 and twm, and I think it is a *MUCH* nicer "looking" interface
than the Amigas. But this doesn't really belong here...

  Jim