Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jhc00614 From: jhc00614@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: More on Trumpcard 500 Message-ID: <111400087@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 23 Jan 90 10:40:05 GMT References: <111400078@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Lines: 25 Nf-ID: #R:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:111400078:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:111400087:000:1637 Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jhc00614 Jan 22 01:53:00 1990 Hey buddy, when I put up my messages concerning the Trump, it was to help other people. Not to be dissected paragraph by paragraph and critiqued and condescended on as you seem so well at doing. If we are going to discuss the merits of each system, fine. But, you make it sound like Trump card buyers are buying the cheapest system available and paying the piper later when they expand. I did do my homework ahead of time and bought my system accordingly. Yes, I do believe my system that probably cost I figure about $100 more (I'm approx. since I have not learned what you paid for your system) is definitley worth it since I get 28 meg more space and a SCSI drive to boot. As for what may or may not be condescending, may be a matter of opinion, but I felt your comments at points were. For example, I wrote I was happy with the Trumpcard. You dissect that part out and say, well of course you're happy, gee whiz, you moved from a floppy system to a hard drive system, for heaven's sake. Yeah, I really need that kind of comment. If you want to write messages to inform people about hardware in the future, leave it at that. Don't dissect other people's subjective comments and define it for them, eh? Make the effort. You'll find people will find you less abrasive. As for me being abrasive, I plead guilty, but if you read my replies, it's starts off very courteous to your first response, but ends with acrimony after your condescending second response. Later p.s. I can't wait to see this dissected. Dissect to your hearts content and enjoy yourself.