Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:48211 comp.sys.amiga.tech:9510
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!uci-ics!orion.oac.uci.edu!eapu030
From: eapu030@orion.oac.uci.edu (Jason Goldberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Comparison of GVP 030, A2630, A2630
Message-ID: <4409@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Date: 24 Jan 90 07:15:33 GMT
References: <1271@bmers58.UUCP>
Reply-To: eapu030@orion.oac.uci.edu (Jason Goldberg)
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Lines: 17

In article <1271@bmers58.UUCP> uunet!bnrgate!atreus!keithh (Keith Hanlan) writes:
>Now GVP is shipping with 28 MHz and by summer will be shipping with
>33 MHz. Obviously, the speed won't scale linearly but it should get
>even faster. Does anybody know if CBM is going to up their clock 
>at all? Dave?
There new adds are back to 25 Mhz.
>
>I'd be partial to the CBM board with these figures.
>
>Any comments?

Particularly if you consider the A2630 offers Unix compatabilty, and the
ability to add a 64 MEG daughter board, and the A2630 can be a great
solution for the majority of the people.  Not to mention, an AT contorller
that supports only two device is kinda rinky-dink, in my mind.

-Jason-