Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!psuvm!sab121
From: SAB121@PSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: 20Mhz Transwarp GS (And a question.)
Message-ID: <90021.212729SAB121@PSUVM.BITNET>
Date: 22 Jan 90 02:27:29 GMT
References: <9001220025.AA17790@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 18

In article <9001220025.AA17790@en.ecn.purdue.edu>, ditz@EN.ECN.PURDUE.EDU
(Michael R Ditz) says:
>
>     The message I posted the other day about the possible production of
>a 20 Mhz 65816 and is use by Applied Engineering generated zero interrest.
>Does no one care about their GS anymore?
>
I care about my GS, but this post just didn't seem worth replying to. I
enjoyed the post, don't get me wrong, and if AE is really interested in
making a 20 Mhz Transwarp, I'd buy it.  Still, to reply to a factual (I
hope) article like that didn't seem like it was worth the network costs.

However, after reading several other posts, I've decided to add in my
$0.02.  UNIX on a GS running at 20 Mhz... Any takers?  Definitely worth
it if it can be implemented.  And how come only AE is interested?  Why
not Apple? Are these chips as "unreliable" as the 12 Mhz chips Mensch
was talking about?  Or is it just another piece of vapor ware to see
just how gullible the ][ world is?