Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU From: Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: undocumented DOS call Message-ID: <25b85ecb@ralf> Date: 20 Jan 90 11:51:23 GMT Sender: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu Organization: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science Lines: 19 In-Reply-To: <1249@srhqla.SR.COM> In article <1249@srhqla.SR.COM>, tcm@srhqla.SR.COM (Tim Meighan) wrote: }The book DOS PROGRAMMER'S REFERENCE (published by Que) contains a complete }reference section that includes the undocumented DOS functions. And, as I noticed while glancing through it in a bookstore, at least part of the info on undocumented DOS functions was copied (verbatim!) from an early- 1988 version of the interrupt list I maintain. If you want a much more complete version of the info, get an up-to-date copy of the interrupt list (PD1:INTER190.ARC on SIMTEL20 or interrup.zip in /afs/cs/user/ralf/pub on CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.222.173]; hopefully coming across comp.binaries.ibm.pc sometime soon). -- UUCP: {ucbvax,harvard}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=- 412-268-3053 (school) -=- FAX: ask ARPA: ralf@cs.cmu.edu BIT: ralf%cs.cmu.edu@CMUCCVMA FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/46 "How to Prove It" by Dana Angluin Disclaimer? I claimed something? 14. proof by importance: A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question.