Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!denbeste
From: denbeste@bgsuvax.UUCP (William C. DenBesten)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Priority scheme for comp.sys.mac.binaries?
Message-ID: <5360@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jan 90 17:51:38 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 23

kovar@popvax.harvard.edu (David C. Kovar) writes:
>Classifications:
>  1) Latest virus software or items of similar nature.
>  2) Original freeware that fits in one article.
>  3) Original shareware that fits in one article.
>  4) One article items that don't fit in above classifications.
>  4) Multipart freeware. [Technotes included.]
>  5) Multipart shareware.
>  6) Demo/crippleware.

I am interested in the opinion of Roger L. Long, the comp.binaries.mac
moderator.  He knows the scripts that he uses and how he can handle
various modifications.  I would be willing to let him select
whatever priority scheme he thinks suitable.  If, for example, he
finds that he would like the sole criterion to be filesize because he
can totally automate the process, i could live with this.

I would like to propose that he increase the daily flow and clear the
backlog when net traffic drops.  This happens over christmas, spring
and summer breaks.  

-- 
William C. DenBesten  is  denbeste@bgsu.edu  or  denbesten@bgsuopie.bitnet