Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!tnoibbc!remco
From: remco@tnoibbc.UUCP (Remco Bruyne)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Priority scheme for comp.sys.mac.binaries?
Message-ID: <1374@tnoibbc.UUCP>
Date: 22 Jan 90 08:51:15 GMT
References: <1330@husc6.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: remco@tnoibbc.UUCP (Remco Bruyne)
Organization: Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, IBBC-TNO, The Netherlands
Lines: 25

In article <1330@husc6.harvard.edu> kovar@popvax.harvard.edu (David C. Kovar) writes:

[free translation of article: ' my proposal for a classification
scheme for comp.mac.binaries is:]

>Classifications:
>  1) Latest virus software or items of similar nature.
>  2) Original freeware that fits in one article.
>  3) Original shareware that fits in one article.
>  4) One article items that don't fit in above classifications.
>  4) Multipart freeware. [Technotes included.]
>  5) Multipart shareware.
>  6) Demo/crippleware.

I agree with this scheme, but wouldn't mind if the multipart commercial
demos were left out. There are enough server machines, so an announcement
would suffice.

Remco


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
 Remco Bruijne      USENET: remco@tnoibbc    PHONE: +31 15 606437
------------------------------------------------------------------