Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!datran2!smb From: smb@datran2.uunet (Steven M. Boker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Kernal-Corruption-Bug-Fix bug Keywords: kernal bug next mailing Message-ID: <422@datran2.uunet> Date: 18 Jan 90 19:35:18 GMT Organization: Data Transforms, Denver, CO Lines: 25 ------------WARNING------------- There is a problem with the documentation sent out to NeXT developers this week. The instruction sheet for preventing the kernal corruption bug lists two methods for preventing the bug. The first method, using chmod from the shell doesn't work. My experience: After su-ing to root I used chmod to change the permissions on the /sdmach file such that execution permission was denied. (chmod a-x /sdmach). A quich check of the permissions with ls -l revealed that the change had indeed taken effect. However, after a cold boot the Directory Browser still showed the sdmach file as executable! I have never seen this discrepancy between the Directory Browser and the Shell after a cold boot. Fool that I am, I decided to give it a try. One hand poised on the power switch, I double clicked /sdmach from the Directory Browser. Astonished, I watched sdmach begin to launch. Everything seems fine after my fingers did the walking on my powerbar. Anyone have suggestions about what's going on or how to test if my kernal is corrupted? -- Steve Boker smb@datran2.uunet.uu.net Black holes are where God divides by zero.... I have my own methods.