Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:3940 comp.unix.i386:2423 gnu.gcc:1270
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!bu.edu!bu-cs!lll-winken!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,comp.unix.i386,gnu.gcc
Subject: Re: gcc/gdb/gas on 386
Message-ID: <-361W=6xds13@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 19 Jan 90 15:28:20 GMT
References: <1990Jan19.030718.16736@alembic.acs.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 10

In article <1990Jan19.030718.16736@alembic.acs.com> bill@alembic.acs.com (Bill Hatch) writes:
> I have successfully installed and tested [GCC etc...] on my ALR 386/220
> under Microport 3.0e [and] an HP Vectra 386 machine under Xenix 3.2 along
> with the uport C libraries converted to GNU format.

How much work has to be done to make this something that can be distributed
in binary form? Is library conversion an automatic matter, so that you can
just drop this in on a new system, or would it require handholding? Are the
libraries available without the development kit enough to get it up? What
about include files?
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
/      \
\_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'