Xref: utzoo news.groups:16689 rec.arts.movies:28798
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!bionet!ames!amdahl!pacbell!indetech!david
From: david@indetech.com (David Kuder)
Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REC.ARTS.CINEMA -- drawing the discussion to a close?
Message-ID: <1990Jan21.230426.5361@indetech.com>
Date: 21 Jan 90 23:04:26 GMT
References: <50608@bbn.COM> <1990Jan9.175821.19661@athena.mit.edu> <1990Jan11.033402.23405@sq.sq.com> <50756@bbn.COM> <1990Jan14.081527.2367@sq.sq.com>
Reply-To: david@indetech.UUCP (David Kuder)
Organization: Independence Technologies, Inc. Fremont, CA
Lines: 10

In article <1990Jan14.081527.2367@sq.sq.com> msb@sq.com (Mark Brader)
writes a few good reasons about why the new serious movie group should
be under r.a.m.  I have to agree with him.

>Could I interest you in rec.arts.movies.academic?
No, but how about rec.arts.movies.forum?  Better than ".serious" or
".m" and avoids most less pleasant connotations.
-- 
David A. Kuder                                               Now what coach?
415 438-2003  david@indetech.com  {uunet,sun,sharkey,pacbell}!indetech!david