Xref: utzoo sci.philosophy.tech:1964 news.groups:16694 talk.philosophy.misc:3460 talk.politics.misc:41607 talk.politics.theory:4640 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,news.groups,talk.philosophy.misc,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.theory Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism Message-ID: <1990Jan22.050117.26454@twwells.com> Date: 22 Jan 90 05:01:17 GMT References: <369@dbase.A-T.COM> <26157@cup.portal.com> Followup-To: news.groups Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Lines: 12 In article <26157@cup.portal.com> ROSS_DAVID_HARTSHORN@cup.portal.com writes: : [reasons for moderation of the proposed group.] Very few people want moderation. I believe that this is a mistake, but I'll go with it. BTW, discussion of this should be in news.groups, to which I've directed followups. --- Bill { uunet | novavax | ankh } !twwells!bill bill@twwells.com