Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!princeton!phoenix From: greg@phoenix (greg Nowak) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Call for discussion: soc.culture.polish Message-ID: <13174@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 22 Jan 90 21:00:19 GMT References: <21137@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <3373@cbnewsj.ATT.COM> <4287@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <21792@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Sender: greg@phoenix.Princeton.EDU Reply-To: greg@phoenix (greg Nowak) Organization: Cabal of Fools; Phoenix Gang Lines: 28 In-reply-to: MICHAL@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Michal Chmielewski) In article <21792@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, MICHAL@kuhub (Michal Chmielewski) writes: >In article <4287@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>, jack@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Jack Campin) writes: >> seems odd to me that we're proposing a group for a specific part of the >> Slavic world (or of Eastern Europe) before having a more general one. Do >> we need to create a soc.culture.montenegrin group before we can mention the >> place, for example? Not at all. Newsgroup creation is determined by interest. If we Poles can get our own newsgroup, great. If not, we can band together with other slavs until we have a majority. If the Montenegrins want a group, they can band together with the Slovenes, or maybe they'll all have to get together with the Serbians to face political reality. We don't have to wait for a higher-level decision about how to deal with slavs on the net; it evolves naturally according to people's expressed interests. There's no requirement of top-downness for newsgroup creation. > Maybe the name of the group is wrong then ? Anyone want to comment on >it ? Maybe talk.politics.polish will be more appropriate than >soc.culture.polish ? I have a feeling that there will be more effective and informative discussions than would be indicated by a "talk" hierarchy. Besides, who can separate polish politics and culture these days? ...!rutgers!phoenix.princeton.edu!greg Greg Nowak/Phoenix Gang/Princeton NJ 08540