Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: sci.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <1631@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 25 Jan 90 18:32:57 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001140024.AA18363@apee.ogi.edu> <8P1157Gxds8@ficc.uu.net> <8250@portia.Stanford.EDU> <1990Jan17.083725.1215@twwells.com> <9001182300.AA28308@apee.ogi.edu> <10507@saturn.ADS.COM> <900@athen.sinix.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 9

In article <900@athen.sinix.UUCP> es@athen.UUCP (Dr. Sanio) writes:
>Concerning your "true believers" argument:did you follow the Beckmann
>discussion in sci.physics or cold fusion arguments?

Did you look at the current state of the Beckmann discussion?  The
main defender of Beckmann's theory says he now regards it as faslified
until he can see how it deals with a certain problem raised on the
net.  And much of that discussion concerned experiments,
falsification, etc.