Xref: utzoo news.groups:16857 talk.religion.newage:5559
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!slab.enet.dec.com
From: burch@slab.enet.dec.com (Ben Burch)
Newsgroups: news.groups,talk.religion.newage
Subject: Re: 5 days since end of talk.religion.pagan voting
Message-ID: <7827@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Date: 26 Jan 90 12:41:19 GMT
Sender: newsdaemon@shlump.nac.dec.com
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 20

-Message-Text-Follows-

In article <9853@hoptoad.uucp>, tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) writes...
>It's been five days since the end of the *extended* talk.religion.pagan
>voting period...

Tim, why did I know that you would again feel that this was your business?

I think you owe us all a detailed explaination of WHY you feel like
meddling in this affair.  I am willing to be convinced that you are
right, and the T.R.P. vote collector is wrong, but it is going to take
more than a "Daddy!  He's cheating!" message to do it.  The imposition
of rules on a chaos like usenet was never meant to encourage barracks
lawyers, but rather to permit the creation of a new newsgroups on more
than a whim.  It is the net.gods who must be convinced of the mandate
for a new group, not me, and not you.  They are not likely to either
be extrodinarily picky about the rules or unaware of the time frames
involved.

- Ben Burch