Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!motcsd!motsj1!mcdchg!att!chinet!les From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: The Rape of Usenet (an alternative view) Keywords: The wholesale capturing of Usenet by GEnie Message-ID: <1990Jan25.184540.13370@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 25 Jan 90 18:45:40 GMT References: <946@crash.cts.com> <6576@brspyr1.BRS.Com> <1989Dec21.024040.25157@athena.mit.edu> Reply-To: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX Lines: 32 In article <1989Dec21.024040.25157@athena.mit.edu> jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes: > It is irrelevant what the specific charges are for. The fact is >that if people are reading the postings that are gatewayed to GEnie, >then GEnie is making money off of them [...] No, it is *not* irrelevant what the charges are for. You pay for connect time, not the data. This is no different than the money being made by the phone company. Do you expect the LD carriers to share the profits with the authors? > FSF charges to cover the cost of the tape and the cost of copying >it. They do not charge to make a profit; that would be completely >against what they stand for. No, the FSF charges for the *service* not the content of the tape. They have never been against anyone charging for their services. > Yes, but as I have said in a previous posting, when you pay for the >phone, or the modem, or the Intenet, or the disks, you GET SOMETHING >BACK. Yes, you obtain the (free) data that you would not otherwise have by paying for the services that deliver it to you. In what way would that be different when you use GENIE instead of some other service? Keep in mind that "free" services are never actually free - someone has to pay the bills. The difference with services like GENIE is that users are willing to pay their own way. Obviously, no one is going to be forced to use their services. Les Mikesell les@chinet.chi.il.us