Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!shelby!lindy!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!sorka
From: sorka@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Alan Waterman)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Solar Power
Keywords: solar sun
Message-ID: <7179@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 14 Jan 90 05:03:36 GMT
References: <122@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> <15437@vlsisj.VLSI.COM>
Sender: news@lindy.Stanford.EDU (News Service)
Reply-To: sorka@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Alan Waterman)
Organization: UCSC Undergrads
Lines: 5


If you are talking about the Japanese developed, fold up flexible
solar cells(about 1.5 x 1.5 feet), then you are wrong about them
being less efficient. In fact they are much more efficient than
traditional photoelectric cells.