Xref: utzoo rec.ham-radio:16808 sci.electronics:9551 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!cbnewsl!bonnie!feg From: feg@bonnie.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke,2C-119,7239,ATTBL) Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics Subject: Re: Theoritical Equations for Antennas Keywords: Antennas Message-ID: <3693@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> Date: 17 Jan 90 16:12:53 GMT References: <481303aa.1423f@godzilla.UUCP> Sender: nntp@cbnewsl.ATT.COM Reply-To: feg@bonnie.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 40 In article <481303aa.1423f@godzilla.UUCP> dalyb@godzilla.UUCP (Brian Daly) writes: > >Subject: Re: Need Theoritical Antenna Info >Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics >Keywords: Antennas > > Note that if the antenna length is slightly less than 1/2 wavelength, > the reactance will go to zero. For l of a halfwavelength, the reactance > is approximately zero and the resistance is close to 50 ohms. (42.5 ohms > for wire of small radius). > I think this statement is a bit mixed up. The resistance is going to be more like 72 ohms. For an electrical 1/2 wavelength the reactance will be 42.5 ohms and the resistance will be 73 ohms. > > The analysis of a quarter wave ground plane antenna is essentially > a vertical electrical dipole above a ground plane. > > When the length of the antenna is a quarter wave, and the height above > the ground plane is zero, then: > > Input impedance = 36.5 + j21.25 (note that this is one half the input > impedance of a half wave dipole) > As I noted above for a halfwave, your parenthetic comment now agrees with the halfwave case. Again, if the monopole is slightly less than an electrical 1/4 wavelength the reactance will go to zero. BTW, I think most of these cases assume the current loop location, e.g. for the half wave dipole we are looking at the impedance at the dipole's center. If we were looking at the current node the impedance would be quite different. Forrest Gehrke feg@clyde.ATT.COM k2bt