Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:9597 rec.ham-radio:16859 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio Subject: Re: naive question about RF propagation Message-ID: <6699@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> Date: 19 Jan 90 01:17:32 GMT References: <28774@amdcad.AMD.COM> Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Followup-To: sci.electronics Distribution: na Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 33 In article <28774@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.amd.com () writes: >We all know that AM broadcast radio fades when you drive under a bridge >but FM doesn't tend to nearly as much. Why is this? Does RF at the FM >broadcast frequencies propagate better? I thought the higher the frequency, >the more it exhibited "line of sight" behavior. Or is it because AM >shows the signal reduction more directly? Shouldn't AGC take care of >that? It's because the AM signals are low frequency = long wavelength and those long waves can't fit into the opening of the tunnel like the hi-frequency FM signals can. Similar reason FM/high-frequency signals don't propogate as far as AM//low-frequency: Low-frequency Radio signal-----+ | V ** * * Hi-frequency signal-+ * ^ * _ _ _ _ V_ _ / \ * XMTR | |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_/ \ * RCVR * / \ * * * * / MOUNTAIN \ * * * * / \ * * * * / \ * * ** / \ ** / \ / \ kEITHe Standard Smileys Apply :-)