Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!cbnews!military From: gwh%tornado.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Converting Subs [Was:Re: Military Cuts Summary] Summary: Possible but unlikely Message-ID: <13425@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 23 Jan 90 03:57:48 GMT Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 40 Approved: military@att.att.com From: gwh%tornado.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert) Two cents from a naval architect-in-training on the continuing discussion on converting ssbn's to ssn's. First: the sonar. Many of the current generation SSBN's use the BQQ-6 sonar set. this is in every way but the active sonar a BQQ-5, the same as the Los Angeles uses. The BQQ-6 has no active component, but that could be added back in with "minimal" trouble from what i have been told [i.e. no need to rebuild the bow too badly... tho the person who told me that was a techie not a naval architect.] Second: the weapons. a torpedo is a torpedo, and the SSBN's have the tubes to launch 'em. If you want the vertical launch Tomhawk tubes that the newer LA's have, you can replace a few [or a lot] of the SSBM tubes with vls. caveat: this would require a bit of structural work and will thus cost some money. Third: the reason why i don't think it will happen. We are USING the more modern SSBN's in our force. There are a lot of our deterrent warheads at sea at this moment on them. Therefore, if we were to convert any they would be the old ones... And old SSBN's have old reactors. The end result of the conversion would be a relatively noisy [older quieting technology] and more trouble-prone boat, with a relatively short lifetime before it needs to be scrapped due to reactor aging. I think that the disatvantages outweigh the atvantages. It is a quick cheap to get some boats fast, but it gives a substandard force. The navy may well be planning to do this if we have a big war that lasts more than three months, but i doubt it will happen in peacetime. **************************************************************************** George William Herbert | UCB Naval Architecture [On schedule? at UCB? Yes!] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- gwh@ocf.berkeley.edu ||||||||| "And What if I Don't?" "Then, You Die, gwh@soda.berkeley.edu ||||||||||||||| the Girl dies, Everybody Dies..." maniac@garnet.berkeley.edu |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| -Heavy Metal