Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uunet!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!cs.glasgow.ac.uk!tommyk
From: tommyk@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Tommy Kelly)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Dynamic internal state
Message-ID: <4871@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Mar 90 20:20:07 GMT
References: <32937@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <132903@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <36999@mips.mips.COM> <10237@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Reply-To: tommyk@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Tommy Kelly)
Organization: Comp Sci, Glasgow Univ, Scotland
Lines: 7

Does anyone know if failing to meet the minimum clock freq. on a dynamic
device could actually DAMAGE the part?
tk
-- 
================================================================================
Disclaimer: "You can't pin that wrap on me."
================================================================================