Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven!mimsy!mojo!SYSMGR@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU
From: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Single user vs. shared
Message-ID: <0093401C.86638F00@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU>
Date: 21 Mar 90 15:14:43 GMT
References: <51771@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <100598@convex.convex.com> <52661@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <1990Mar18.023523.4034@ultra.com> <52817@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <2165@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <1990Mar20.174931.2202@utzoo.uucp> <1990Mar21.010346.6552@ultra.com>,<34853@news.Thin
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System)
Reply-To: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Organization: The U. of MD, CP, CAD lab
Lines: 14

In article <34853@news.Think.COM>, barmar@ (Barry Margolin) writes:
>?  What do
>you do about the users who don't feel like upgrading just yet (perhaps
>they haven't gotten around to getting the upgraded version of some
>application so that it will work with the new system)?

Or when the upgrades break the existing applications, and then the systems
manager doesn't have to time to fix that user's problem? 

"But it's only one person out of the company..." The greatest good for
the greatest number...? Euhhhhhh. Computing technology should be liberating,
not enslaving.

				Doug