Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!wuarchive!cec2!sek9424
From: sek9424@cec1.wustl.edu (Scott Eric Keller)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Mskermit 3.00
Message-ID: <1990Mar21.044838.18358@cec1.wustl.edu>
Date: 21 Mar 90 04:48:38 GMT
References: <19686@mephisto.UUCP> <654@sixhub.UUCP> <7217@hydra.gatech.EDU> <23587@usc.edu> <1990Mar20.094508.13189@uwasa.fi>
Sender: news@cec2 (USENET News System)
Reply-To: sek9424@cec2.wustl.edu (Scott Eric Keller)
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Lines: 16


	Has anyone experienced any problems using extended packets with 3.00?
I have tried to receive 2000 byte packets from C-Kermit on the unix box here
and my end seems to ack mid-packet frequently. The throughput is not what it
should be either. Smaller packets work fine. Debug output shows that there
are no nacks or any other glitches. I get the impression that 3.00 may say
it is wanting to receive 2000 byte packets but only looking for 1000 bytes
like some of the earlier versions were limited to. Comments?

						Scott

-- 
    Scott Keller (KA0WCH) - Permanent Undergrad - Dept. of Computer Science
		Wa$hington Univer$ity - St. Louis, Mo. USA
Internet: sek9424@cec2.wustl.edu      UUCP:ihnp4!wucec2!sek9424 (I think...)   
   The opinions represented here are mine and mine alone, not Wa$h. U's.