Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ncar!mephisto!ncsuvx!news
From: george@shumv1.uucp (George Browning)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Telemate 2.00A
Keywords: better than Telix?
Message-ID: <1990Mar22.164148.19865@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>
Date: 22 Mar 90 16:41:48 GMT
References: <389@mlacus.oz> <SAB#!J%@rpi.edu> <10029@wpi.wpi.edu>
Sender: news@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: george@shumv1.ncsu.edu (George Browning)
Organization: NCSU Computing Center
Lines: 16

In article <10029@wpi.wpi.edu> ggray@wpi.wpi.edu (Gary P Gray) writes:
>I tried it.  It's nice, but it has one major drawback in my opinion.  It runs
>like molasses on my 4.77 Mhz XT. Actually, it's the terminal output that is so
>slow, the editor and such pop up quite nicely, the mouse behaves great and so
>forth, but the text from the modem is just to slow and "jumpy" for my taste.
>I'd probably use it if I had a 12Mhz AT or maybe even a turbo XT.  Notice, 

 	I've found the opposite on the machines I've tried.  Telemate seemed 
a lot snappier in the terminal window than both Procomm and Qmodem, 
although I've never tried it on a 4.77 machine.

                                             - Jeff
_____________________________________________________________________
| George Browning                  North Carolina State University  |
| george@shumv1.ncsu.edu                               Raleigh, NC  |
|___________________________________________________________________|