Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Sprint and Three-way Calling
Message-ID: <5136@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 13 Mar 90 18:04:01 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 15
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 170, Message 5 of 9


Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com> writes:

> I tried using ATT with 3 way calling, and the volume
> levels were definitely lacking compared to Sprint...

I think you may be experiencing a quirk of your area. My experience up
and down the state of California has been exactly the opposite. The
differences are minor, but usually if there is a difference, it's in
favor of AT&T. AT&T ought to know how to make their own technology
work!


        John Higdon         |   P. O. Box 7648   |   +1 408 723 1395
    john@bovine.ati.com     | San Jose, CA 95150 |       M o o !