Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!uupsi!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: ben@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com (Benjamin Ellsworth) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Billing and Answer Supervision Message-ID: <5195@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 16 Mar 90 03:43:41 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 32 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 175, Message 3 of 9 > Why is it that people are perfectly happy to get non-itemized > bills from other utilities but not from the phone company? Well actually I am not perfectly happy, *but* unlike the telephone, I can go out and get daily readings off of my meters if I want to. I have access to exactly the same data that is going to go into the billing system. If things start getting weird, I can experiment and watch the effects in "real time" on my account balance. Given this level of control and information. I can discover how my use habits affect my cost and make intelligent decisions on how to change my use patterns. If all I got was a single bill, I wouldn't be able to tell if I was making too many calls to grandma or too many calls to my brother. > It's certainly not because of the amount of money involved. The > average person's average phone bill is probably a lot higher than > their water bill, about the same as their electric bill, and a lot > lower than their gas bill (assuming they heat with gas). We may not be average, but at our house the phone bill is almost the highest in the "utility" category. It's really not very high (in the $60 range), but our other bills are lower. Benjamin Ellsworth | ben@cv.hp.com | INTERNET Hewlett-Packard Company | {backbone}!hplabs!hp-pcd!ben | UUCP 1000 N.E. Circle | (USA) (503) 750-4980 | FAX Corvallis, OR 97330 | (USA) (503) 757-2000 | VOICE All relevant disclaimers apply.