Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: Chip Rosenthal Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Sprint and Three-way Calling Message-ID: <5228@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 15 Mar 90 19:37:17 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin (yay!) Lines: 20 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 177, Message 2 of 10 In article <5136@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon writes: >> I tried using ATT with 3 way calling, and the volume >> levels were definitely lacking compared to Sprint... >I think you may be experiencing a quirk of your area. My experience up >and down the state of California has been exactly the opposite. Not necessarily. I saw some tests of using V.35 modems with the three LD carriers in Data Communications about a year back. In all tests (BER, call completion, setup time, etc.) AT&T won, except for one. Sprint had the best signal levels. I doubt it's a quirk so much as different results for different conditions. Chip Rosenthal | Yes, you're a happy man and you're chip@chinacat.Lonestar.ORG | a lucky man, but are you a smart Unicom Systems Development, 512-482-8260 | man? -David Bromberg