Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: asuvax!gtephx!mothra!bakerj@ncar.ucar.edu (Jon Baker) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Changing to MCI Long Distance Message-ID: <5459@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 21 Mar 90 06:01:22 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: gte Lines: 27 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 192, Message 8 of 10 In article <5169@accuvax.nwu.edu>, gmc@mvuxr.att.com (Glenn M Cooley) writes: > NETCO, my local TELCO, also does this (and who out there thinks > they're squeaky clean?) and started charging me for added services > (e.g. call waiting) which I never ordered. They insisted that I just > must have said yes in such a call (or it just must have been my wife) > because this service could not have been supplied otherwise. After > further argument, they canceled the service and credited me the > overcharges (do TELCOs hire people who see arguing as a fringe benefit > or are they trained to never, never, never, give in before 20 minutes > are up) still maintaining that this just could not happen and that > mine was the only case they had ever encountered. Also happened to me a few years back - my long distance service suddenly changed to MCI, even though I had deliberately elected AT&T as my carrier. I called MCI about it, and they admitted to the practice of calling US West and bogusly reporting that customers wanted to change to MCI. The Telco wouldn't argue, for legal reasons and because they could charge for the switch. (As it happens, this was my first such switch, which was a freebie). I convinced the MCI rep that I'd keep their service if they'd credit me the $5 switch fee (which I wasn't actually charged) PLUS another $5 switch fee to switch back to AT&T if I didn't like MCI. I used up my $10 credit years ago, and have kept MCI since. Moral : cheap marketing tactic, but it worked.